What The Rotten Tomatoes Reviews Are Saying About The Rise Of Skywalker

Let's start off with the less heartwarming, more genuinely critical reviews of The Rise of Skywalker, shall we?

Of the reviews logged onto Rotten Tomatoes that register as "Rotten" — that is, ones accompanied by ratings below 60 percent — a large portion of them take issue with the general feeling of forced wish-granting woven throughout the film. This is to say that many critics were displeased by the fact that The Rise of Skywalker feels like it's pandering to the audience — including people who were angry with the events of writer-director Rian Johnson's The Last Jedi, a daring Star Wars installment that divided fans and caused them to bicker with one another for the past two years.

Michael O'Sullivan of The Washington Post was one of a number of critics conflicted over the fan service crammed into The Rise of Skywalker, arguing that the film "panders wildly" and concludes the Skywalker saga "with a story that delivers to the faithful exactly the movie they wanted" — which may or may not be a good thing. He wrote in his review, "Everybody wants a happy ending. But that doesn't mean that we should always get the one we want. It's fine, if also cliche, to be reminded that good will triumph over evil. But it would make for a deeper and more powerful lesson — one that, after nine movies, might leave a lasting dent in the heart — if the hero actually had to give up something, or someone, that didn't feel like a tiniest bit of a cop-out." O'Sullivan gave The Rise of Skywalker two stars out of five.

The Film Stage critic Michael Raup wrote that The Rise of Skywalker is the antithesis to The Last Jedi, in that it doesn't take many risks and undoes a lot of what preceded it. "With noted disappointment and little surprise, J.J. Abrams' finale doesn't just directly refute many of the ideas of its predecessor–its brand of nostalgia also feels more brazenly pandering than heartfelt [...] A direct contradiction to Johnson's repeated mantra of letting old things die, this ninth and final film in the series is wholly about the desire to uncover the past to unlock one's true identity and honor the generations and iconic characters that came before," argued Raup. "By lacking a sense of vision in embracing what came before and ignoring the recently laid path for where this story could go, The Rise of Skywalker is not only a disappointing end to this saga–it's also an ill-fated harbinger for Disney's future in storytelling."

Other critics agreed with Raup's point that The Rise of Skywalker plays it safe and doesn't take the risks that it could have — decisions that many feel are to the film's detriment. 

USA Today's Brian Truitt, who gave The Rise of Skywalker two-and-a-half stars out of four, wrote in his review, "It's impressively ambitious, though great new personalities and fresh storytelling suffer for the sake of fan service [...] Some of the liberties Rian Johnson's Last Jedi took with the nostalgic Star Wars status quo are rethought here, so get ready for a disturbance in the fandom. The result is an uneven third trilogy that feels like they've been flying by the seat of their pants in an X-wing [...] After paying homage to everything that came before, this Star Wars ending is a too-safe landing of a massive pop-culture starship, and a spectacular finale that misses a chance to forge something special."

Over at Slate, Sam Adams wrote that Abrams attempted to "make a movie no one would hate" instead of one that some might love, resulting in a film that's only satisfying because it's been "force-fed" to viewers. He added, "The haste with which The Rise of Skywalker rushes to undo its predecessor is almost comical at first, at least before its capitulation to the franchise's most toxic fans turns outright contemptible."

Stephanie Zacharek at TIME Magazine felt similarly, writing, "This overloaded finale, directed by J.J. Abrams, is for everybody and nobody, a movie that's sometimes reasonably entertaining but that mostly feels reverse-engineered to ensure that the feathers of the Star Wars purists remain unruffled. In its anxiety not to offend, it comes off more like fanfiction than the creation of actual professional filmmakers. A bot would be able to pull off a more surprising movie."

Giving the film a 50 percent score, Slashfilm's Chris Evangelista wrote that The Rise of Skywalker is disappointing and lifeless: "As the story draws to its big, loud climax, and one fan-service moment after another arises, you begin to get the sense that Abrams is just checking off boxes and fulfilling a quota. There's no spark; no joy; no life. If this truly is the end of the Skywalker Saga, what an ignoble end it is."